If Vincent Bugliosi is right about reclaiming history to assert that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, not being part of any conspiracy, .........then why does the American public never get to see this:
Above are some fragments of my new DVD "The Grassy Knoll", a comprehensive documentary film of 2 hours, presenting the solution of the JFK assassination in all its details, told by retired FBI agents and actual participants, including the grassy knoll gunman who fired the fatal headshot.
As the fine and beloved actor/producer that you are, I believe you stand to lose a lot of fans by supporting Mr. Bugliosi's disservice to the truth.
But here's a challenge for objectivity's sake: I will meet you any time, any place, to prove "Reclaiming History" incorrect. With Mr. Bugliosi present if so desired.
With high regards,
"The greater our knowledge increases the more our ignorance unfolds."
John F. Kennedy
The dumbing down of America
Most Americans are not tought to think for themselves. Instead they are - like a herd of sheep - being brainwashed to adhere to authoritive messages, cranked out by corporate owned media.
The latest example being Vincent Bugliosi's 1600+ page rehash of the Warren Report, which has already been officially overturned by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, who concluded that JFK was killed as the result of a conspiracy.
Yet again, Bugliosi attempts to persuade Americans that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone frustrated deranged loser, with no connections to anyone, who wanted to make a name for himself by killing the most powerful man in the country.
But if Americans would think for themselves for just one minute, they would understand that this theory does not wash with Oswald's fierce denials of guilt. In reality he proclaimed his innocence at every opportunity in the short time left for him.
According to Bugliosi, Oswald planned the crime weeks ahead by ordering an antique misaligned rifle and taking a job at the Texas Schoolbook Depository. Oswald's killer Jack Ruby made a vain attempt to let Americans think for themselves. Had the media shown his letter to the public, he might even have been successful when he wrote:
Isn't it strange that Oswald who hasn't worked a lick most of his life, should be fortunate enough to get a job at the Book Building two weeks before the president himself didn't know as to when he was to visit Dallas, now where would a jerk like Oswald get the information that the president was coming to Dallas? Only one person could have had that information, and that man was Johnson who knew weeks in advance as to what was going to happen, because he is the one who was going to arrange the trip for the president, this had been planned long before the president himself knew about, so you can figure that one out. The only one who gained by the shooting of the president was Johnson, and he was in a car in the rear and safe when the shooting took place. What would the Russians, Castro or anyone else have to gain by eliminating the president? If Johnson was so heartbroken over Kennedy, why didn't he do something for Robert Kennedy? All he did was snub him.
Gary Mack, curator ot the 6th floor museum, and portrayed by corporate media as the leading authority on the assassination, even contends that Oswald didn't mean to be caught. He suggests that Oswald deliberately took the difficult shots from behind on Elm street, rather than the easier shots from the front on Houston Street, in order not to be seen by witnesses looking up to the 6th floor window:
But if Americans would think for themselves for just another minute, they would see that if you shoot the president from the top floor of a public building, with two exits on the ground floor, and with police officers all around the building, there is no way of escape (let alone by way of public transport). Unless you have some help from the inside, which is of course exactly what the real assassins got.
But then again, it's not made easier when the guys on the telly are keeping the truth away from you:
Therefore, in addition to the iron clad evidence denying Oswald's guilt, the best clues Americans will get on what happened, defying the official brainwash, are given by some sheer intelligence and common sense. That is, if they still have that. With over 80 % voting for conspiracy, we should close on an optimistic note.
PS: Oh, and by the way, it's getting the same here in Europe.
940 Windsor St.
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
June 17, 2007
Mr. Vincent Bugliosi
C/O W. W. NORTON & COMPANY, INC.
500 Fifth Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10110
Re: “Reclaiming History”
We would all like to still believe in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. Little white lies just seem to make the world more hospitable, more warm and fuzzy. There comes a time, however, when we all must grow up. With regard to the JFK assassination, it’s a shame that you have not.
The JFK event happened so long ago that most U.S. citizens don’t even care about it anymore. They’ve moved on to Paris Hilton’s incarceration. Most U.S. citizens realize that we have a crooked government, guided by the ultra-rich for the ultra-rich.
The accurate historical record shows that the U.S. government was involved in removing several heads of state by executive action, including JFK, to the benefit of a few. Do the names Allende and Guzman and Mossadegh sound familiar, for example. Live with the truth – as opposed to propagating propaganda. What’s next from you? Oh, Nixon was the lone burglar, in other words, he acted alone (for emphasis), in the Watergate break-in. How long will that novel take you to write? Forty (40) years? How much cellulose material will be wasted per novel? Three thousand (3000) pages?
Out of all the hypotheses (non-scientists call them “theories”) posited, yours may very well be the most preposterous of all.
U.S. Citizen Zelmer
COPYRIGHT 2003 jfkmurdersolved.com All Rights Reserved